Teaching module · modules/edu-003

Decolonizing Psychedelic Research: Frameworks and Practices

Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.

WorkshopResearchers, pharmaceutical professionals, policy advocates, therapistsFood of the Gods

Decolonizing Psychedelic Research: Frameworks and Practices

Objectives

  • Understand the history of bioprospecting and biopiracy in psychedelic plant medicines
  • Apply the Nagoya Protocol framework to psychedelic pharmaceutical development
  • Distinguish cognitive liberty arguments from indigenous rights arguments
  • Evaluate current business models (stewardship, FPIC, reciprocity) against historical patterns
  • Understand the entourage effect as a pharmacological expression of indigenous knowledge

Outline

Part 1: The Pattern: Quinine to curare to psilocybin. How bioprospecting works. The María Sabina case in detail.

Part 2: The Legal Frameworks: Nagoya Protocol. FPIC. Native American Church exemptions. The cognitive liberty argument and its limits.

Part 3: Current Business Models: Journey Colab's stewardship model. North Star Ethics Pledge. The Navajo opposition to peyote decriminalization. What "reciprocity" means in practice.

Part 4: The Pharmacological Argument: María Sabina's verdict on synthetic psilocybin. The entourage effect. Why isolated compounds may not capture the full therapeutic picture.

Required reading

  • Gregoire, NEO.LIFE (2020)
  • Schultes, NIMH Symposium (1967)
  • Labate & Cavnar, Therapeutic Use of Ayahuasca (2014)