Editorial draft · writing/storming-heaven-humphry-in-hollywood
Osmond in New York: The APA Roundtable
Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.
Osmond in New York: The APA Roundtable
“When Osmond and Huxley presented mescaline research to the American Psychia…”historytherapy
“When Osmond and Huxley presented mescaline research to the American Psychiatric Association in Atlantic City in 1955, the reception was cold. The men with the electric shock machines were not interested.”
In 1955, Humphry Osmond was invited to present his research on mescaline and LSD at an American Psychiatric Association roundtable in Atlantic City. He and Aldous Huxley had collaborated on the presentation. They were optimistic. They believed the APA would see, as they had seen, that these substances offered a genuine window into altered states of consciousness with profound clinical implications for the treatment of schizophrenia and alcoholism.
The reception was what Huxley, in a letter to Osmond written immediately after, described with his characteristic precision. He enumerated the 'electric shock boys, the Chlorpromaziners, and the 57 Varieties of Psychotherapists, all equally certain that their methods were the best.' The roundtable audience was not hostile so much as disinterested. The prevailing framework of mid-1950s psychiatry had no conceptual slot for what Osmond was describing.
Jay Stevens uses this episode in Storming Heaven to locate the clinical program in its institutional context: a period when psychiatry was reorganizing around pharmacological management (chlorpromazine had been approved in 1954) and behavioral modification. The question of what the patient was experiencing, which was central to Osmond's approach, was becoming less relevant to a field that was increasingly focused on symptom suppression rather than experiential transformation.
Osmond continued his clinical work at Weyburn regardless. The Saskatchewan provincial government was more receptive than the national psychiatric establishment, and the distance from New York allowed him to build without needing the APA's blessing. The work he did at Weyburn between 1952 and 1961, over a thousand alcoholic patients, roughly half achieving lasting sobriety, was the most significant body of clinical psychedelic research of the era. It was conducted largely in isolation from the mainstream institutions that would have given it wider impact.
Sources
- Stevens, Storming Heaven (1987)
- Huxley letter to Osmond, in Moksha (1977)
- Wikipedia, Humphry Osmond
Links for this item
- Posts
- No post is recorded for this item yet.
- Source page
- The sources for this item on RN Collins Selected Work
- Long-form
- This page is the full draft.
- Gallery
- See it in the gallery index
- Project
- About this library on RN Collins Selected Work
- Corrections
- Publication rules and the correction form
Reading list for this book
- Reading list: Storming Heaven Reading list
NotebookLM packs on this book
- The CIA and the Clinic NotebookLM source pack
Bridge pieces that use this book
Science annotations on this book
- Timewave Zero: history accelerates toward a final moment of "maximum novelty" predicted for December 21, 2012. Science annotation
Then vs. Now comparisons on this book
- Psychedelic Prohibition: What the Evidence Actually Showed Then vs. Now comparison
- The Anslinger Theory: Was the Drug War Racist? Then vs. Now comparison
- The Psychedelic Research Interruption: 1968-2018 Then vs. Now comparison
- The CIA and LSD: What MK-Ultra Actually Produced Then vs. Now comparison
- Leary vs. Osmond: The Two Psychedelic Models Then vs. Now comparison
- The Veterans' Ibogaine Breakthrough: A 1968 Pattern That Didn't Repeat Then vs. Now comparison
- Stanislav Grof's Legacy: Has His Cartography Been Validated? Then vs. Now comparison
- MDMA After the FDA Rejection: A 1968 Pattern or a 2024 Delay? Then vs. Now comparison
- The Leary Legacy Reassessed: Was He Entirely Wrong? Then vs. Now comparison
- Holotropic Breathwork as Proof of Concept: Non-Drug Non-Ordinary States Then vs. Now comparison
Claims from this book
- The 1968 Schedule I classification of LSD was a scientific judgment based on evidence of harm Claim
- The 1968 LSD research program had a clinical evidence base sufficient for therapeutic application Claim
- The CIA's MK-Ultra LSD program was counterproductive to its stated goals Claim
- The psychedelic research program, if it had continued without the 1968 scheduling, would have produced... Claim
Other pages in this library that link here
- The Suppression Course module