Claim · claimSorter/cs-045
The psychedelic research program, if it had continued without the 1968 scheduling, would have produced FDA-approved treatments by the 1980s
Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.
The psychedelic research program, if it had continued without the 1968 scheduling, would have produced FDA-approved treatments by the 1980s
Unresolved recorded as “Unknowable Counterfactual” Storming Heaven
The research was producing positive results at rates comparable to what the 2016-2026 research program has produced. The methodological standards required for FDA approval in 1975 were different from current standards. Whether the existing evidence base would have been sufficient for NDA submission is unknowable. Jay Stevens argues it would have taken another 5-10 years of uninterrupted work. The claim is plausible but not verifiable.
Links for this item
- Posts
- No post is recorded for this item yet.
- Source page
- The sources for this item on RN Collins Selected Work
- Long-form
- Public vs. Private: Who Funds the Psychedelic Research Program, the editorial draft this item belongs with
- Gallery
- See it in the gallery index
- Project
- About this library on RN Collins Selected Work
- Corrections
- Publication rules and the correction form
Drafts on the same book
- The Curious Molecule and the Country It Broke Editorial draft
- Ken Kesey and the Acid Tests Editorial draft
- Stanislav Grof and the Cartography of the Psyche Editorial draft
- The Hollywood Sessions Editorial draft
- October 6, 1968: The Last Day Editorial draft
- Osmond in New York: The APA Roundtable Editorial draft
- Alan Watts and the Problem of Integration Editorial draft
- The Second Wave: Why History Is Repeating and How It Might Not Editorial draft
- MDMA's FDA Rejection: A 1968 Pattern in 2024 Editorial draft
- The Bipartisan Moment: Veterans, Ibogaine, and the New Political Map Editorial draft
- State vs. Federal: The Legal Landscape After Oregon and Colorado Editorial draft
- Public vs. Private: Who Funds the Psychedelic Research Program Editorial draft
- Was It Leary's Fault? Editorial draft
- What the CIA Was Looking For Editorial draft
- Huxley's Warning: The Letter That Wasn't Heeded Editorial draft
- The Resumption: Picking Up Where 1968 Left Off Editorial draft
- The Two Worlds: Clinic and Culture Cannot Be Separated Editorial draft
- Stevens's Thesis: Was the 1968 Prohibition Evidence-Based? Editorial draft
- Passage: The Day the Research Stopped Editorial draft
- MDMA After the Rejection: What the 2024 FDA Decision Actually Means Editorial draft
Reading list for this book
- Reading list: Storming Heaven Reading list
NotebookLM packs on this book
- The CIA and the Clinic NotebookLM source pack
Bridge pieces that use this book
Science annotations on this book
- Timewave Zero: history accelerates toward a final moment of "maximum novelty" predicted for December 21, 2012. Science annotation
Then vs. Now comparisons on this book
- Psychedelic Prohibition: What the Evidence Actually Showed Then vs. Now comparison
- The Anslinger Theory: Was the Drug War Racist? Then vs. Now comparison
- The Psychedelic Research Interruption: 1968-2018 Then vs. Now comparison
- The CIA and LSD: What MK-Ultra Actually Produced Then vs. Now comparison
- Leary vs. Osmond: The Two Psychedelic Models Then vs. Now comparison
- The Veterans' Ibogaine Breakthrough: A 1968 Pattern That Didn't Repeat Then vs. Now comparison
- Stanislav Grof's Legacy: Has His Cartography Been Validated? Then vs. Now comparison
- MDMA After the FDA Rejection: A 1968 Pattern or a 2024 Delay? Then vs. Now comparison
- The Leary Legacy Reassessed: Was He Entirely Wrong? Then vs. Now comparison
- Holotropic Breathwork as Proof of Concept: Non-Drug Non-Ordinary States Then vs. Now comparison
Other pages in this library that link here
- The Suppression Course module