Editorial draft · writing/mckenna-time-wave-math
The Mathematics of Novelty
Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.
The Mathematics of Novelty
“The Timewave was a mathematical model of time's qualitative structure. McKe…”philosophyhistory
“The Timewave was a mathematical model of time's qualitative structure. McKenna derived it from the I Ching. The mathematics was criticized by professional mathematicians. The underlying philosophical claim, that time is textured, remains interesting.”
The Timewave Zero theory began as an attempt to make a specific phenomenological observation mathematically rigorous: that some periods of time feel more 'novel', more full of unexpected connections, more generative of new forms, than others.
McKenna's starting point was the I Ching, the Chinese system of sixty-four hexagrams used for divination since antiquity. He observed that the sequence of hexagrams, when treated as a numerical series, had a structure that could be interpreted as a wave function. He mapped this wave function onto historical time, aligning it so that its predicted 'singularity', the point of maximum novelty, coincided with December 21, 2012.
Professional mathematicians who examined the theory raised multiple objections. The derivation from the I Ching was arbitrary, McKenna had chosen a particular mapping of hexagrams to numbers that produced the desired wave, but other mappings were equally justifiable and produced different results. The theory was not derived from empirical data about historical events but was fitted to historical data post hoc, which violates basic principles of predictive modeling.
McKenna acknowledged some of these criticisms and adjusted his mapping of the I Ching values at least once in response. He never fully resolved the mathematical objections, and the 2012 endpoint was falsified without drama when nothing of particular significance occurred.
What remains from the Timewave is the philosophical claim McKenna derived from the I Ching insight: that time has qualitative structure, that novelty is not uniformly distributed, that history has what he called 'attractor basins', periods toward which events seem to converge. This claim, stripped of the specific mathematical apparatus and the 2012 prediction, is a genuine philosophical proposition. Whether it is true is a question that the available evidence neither confirms nor refutes. It is the kind of question that the Timewave was supposed to answer and instead preserved as a question.
Sources
- McKenna & McKenna, The Invisible Landscape (1975)
- Wikipedia, Novelty Theory (McKenna)
- Various mathematical critiques of the Timewave, 1990s [Source not found; under review]
Links for this item
- Posts
- No post is recorded for this item yet.
- Source page
- The sources for this item on RN Collins Selected Work
- Long-form
- This page is the full draft.
- Gallery
- See it in the gallery index
- Project
- About this library on RN Collins Selected Work
- Corrections
- Publication rules and the correction form
Reading list for this book
- Reading list: True Hallucinations Reading list
NotebookLM packs on this book
- The Machine Elves NotebookLM source pack
Bridge pieces that use this book
- María Sabina and the Machine Elves: Two Accounts of Encountering the Other Bridge piece
- The Experiment and the Institution: La Chorrera and the Weyburn Trials Bridge piece
Science annotations on this book
- The La Chorrera experiment produced a novel pharmacological state by combining mushroom tryptamines with... Science annotation
Then vs. Now comparisons on this book
- The Pineal Gland as DMT Source: Was Strassman Right? Then vs. Now comparison
- Psilocybin and Human Evolution: McKenna's Core Claim Then vs. Now comparison
- DMT Entities: The Consistency Problem Then vs. Now comparison
- Timewave Zero: The 2012 Prediction Then vs. Now comparison
- The La Chorrera Experiment: What Actually Happened Then vs. Now comparison
- The Entity Research Program: From Anecdote to Survey Science Then vs. Now comparison
- Dennis McKenna's Scientific Career: What La Chorrera Built Then vs. Now comparison
- The Endogenous DMT Confirmation: Is the Spirit Molecule Really There? Then vs. Now comparison
- Psychedelic Science After McKenna: Does the Field Engage His Questions? Then vs. Now comparison
- The Rhetorical Legacy: What McKenna's Voice Did to the Movement Then vs. Now comparison
Claims from this book
- December 21, 2012 would be a singularity of maximum novelty, the Timewave Zero endpoint Claim
- The machine elves McKenna described are consistently encountered by DMT users across cultures Claim
- DMT entities are consistently reported across cultures, suggesting they are not purely culturally constructed Claim
- The La Chorrera experiment of 1971 produced a genuine philosophical breakthrough Claim
- High-dose psilocybin produces experiences indistinguishable from near-death experiences Claim
Other pages in this library that link here
- The Science of the Experience Course module
- The Cultural Reckoning Course module