Claim · claimSorter/cs-014

The drug war's racial targeting was incidental, an unintended consequence of neutral enforcement

Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.

The drug war's racial targeting was incidental, an unintended consequence of neutral enforcement

Refuted recorded as “Falsified” Chasing the Scream

Ehrlichman (Nixon domestic policy adviser, Harper's 2016): 'We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but...by criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities.' The account rests on Baum's notes alone, and Ehrlichman's family and several former Nixon aides dispute it. ACLU (2020): Black Americans 3.73x more likely to be arrested for marijuana despite similar use rates. The racial targeting was explicit policy, not incidental outcome.

Ehrlichman in Baum (2016); ACLU (2020)