Editorial draft · writing/harm-reduction-movement
Harm Reduction: The Other War
Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.
Harm Reduction: The Other War
“The harm reduction movement didn't argue that drugs were good. It argued th…”policytherapy
“The harm reduction movement didn't argue that drugs were good. It argued that people who use drugs don't deserve to die from preventable causes, and that the state has an obligation to prevent that.”
Harm reduction is the set of policies and practices that aim to reduce the negative consequences of drug use without requiring abstinence as the goal. Safe injection sites allow users to inject drugs under medical supervision, with naloxone available and clean equipment provided. Needle exchanges distribute sterile syringes to prevent HIV and hepatitis transmission. Heroin maintenance programs provide pharmaceutical-grade heroin to users who have not responded to other treatment, in a clinical setting with medical oversight.
These programs do not require drug users to stop using drugs. They require, instead, that drug users not die from preventable causes while they remain users, either from overdose, from infected equipment, or from contaminated supply.
Chasing the Scream documents the political resistance to harm reduction as a feature of the drug war's moral logic: if addiction is a moral failure, reducing the harm of addiction without requiring cessation is complicity in that failure. The abstinence-only model, which informed US drug treatment policy through at least the 1990s, treated harm reduction as sending the wrong message.
The evidence accumulated against this position. Safe injection sites in Vancouver, Sydney, and Amsterdam documented reductions in overdose deaths and HIV transmission without documented increases in drug use in surrounding communities. The Frankfurt model, documented in Chasing the Scream, produced dramatic reductions in street crime as users no longer needed to steal to afford their drugs. The Swiss heroin maintenance program produced the outcomes Hari summarizes: crime down 60 percent, employment doubled, program cost less than imprisonment.
As of 2025, the first sanctioned safe injection site in the United States, OnPoint NYC, opened in November 2021, had reversed over 1,200 overdoses without a single death on-site. US harm reduction policy has shifted substantially since Hari wrote. The resistance to it, in some political quarters, remains essentially unchanged.
Sources
- Hari, Chasing the Scream (2015)
- EMCDDA, European Drug Reports (2020-2024)
- Wikipedia, Harm Reduction
Links for this item
- Posts
- No post is recorded for this item yet.
- Source page
- The sources for this item on RN Collins Selected Work
- Long-form
- This page is the full draft.
- Gallery
- See it in the gallery index
- Project
- About this library on RN Collins Selected Work
- Corrections
- Publication rules and the correction form
Reading list for this book
- Reading list: Chasing the Scream Reading list
NotebookLM packs on this book
- The Opposite of Addiction NotebookLM source pack
Bridge pieces that use this book
- The War Osmond Was Fighting and the War Anslinger Was Fighting Bridge piece
- The Race Against Time: Schultes's Urgency and Hari's Crisis Bridge piece
Science annotations on this book
- Endogenous DMT is produced by the pineal gland and mediates mystical states, near-death experiences, and deep... Science annotation
Then vs. Now comparisons on this book
- Rat Park: Was Alexander Right? Then vs. Now comparison
- The Opposite of Addiction: Connection, How Hari's Claim Holds Up Then vs. Now comparison
- Portugal's Drug Decriminalization: The 2026 Picture Then vs. Now comparison
- The Anslinger-Holiday Story: Historical Accuracy Then vs. Now comparison
- Chasing the Scream's Rat Park: The Replication Problem Then vs. Now comparison
- The Drug War Centenary: 2014 in Retrospect Then vs. Now comparison
- The Safe Supply Experiment: British Columbia 2023-2024 Then vs. Now comparison
- The Fentanyl-Naloxone Race: Has Harm Reduction Kept Pace? Then vs. Now comparison
- Billie Holiday's Historical Accuracy: What the Documents Show Then vs. Now comparison
- The Housing First Evidence: Connection as Concrete Policy Then vs. Now comparison
- The Racial Drug War in 2026: Has Anything Changed? Then vs. Now comparison
Claims from this book
- The opposite of addiction is connection Claim
- The drug war's racial targeting was incidental, an unintended consequence of neutral enforcement Claim
- Portugal's drug decriminalization model is a straightforward success that any country could replicate Claim
- Drug prohibition increases violence by creating black markets with no legal dispute resolution Claim
- Drug addiction is primarily a response to trauma, not primarily a pharmacological inevitability Claim
- Cannabis legalization does not produce significant increases in youth cannabis use Claim
Other pages in this library that link here
- The Politics of Plants Course module