Editorial draft · writing/passage-chasing-holiday
Passage: Billie Holiday on Addiction
Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.
Passage: Billie Holiday on Addiction
“Imagine if the government chased sick people with diabetes, put a tax on in…”historypolicy
“Imagine if the government chased sick people with diabetes, put a tax on insulin and drove it into the black market, told doctors they couldn't treat them, then sent them to jail.”
The passage: 'Imagine if the government chased sick people with diabetes, put a tax on insulin and drove it into the black market, told doctors they couldn't treat them, then sent them to jail. If we did that, everyone would know we were crazy. Yet we do practically the same thing every day in the week to sick people hooked on drugs.'
Why this passage: Holiday wrote this in 1956, the same year Osmond was introducing the word 'psychedelic' to the scientific literature. She was not a pharmacologist or a policy analyst. She was a woman who had been directly targeted by Harry Anslinger's Federal Bureau of Narcotics, who had had her New York cabaret license revoked and been denied the ability to work in the city where her career was centered, who had been arrested, imprisoned, and under federal surveillance for years.
From inside this experience, she produced one of the clearest arguments in the addiction policy literature: the analogy between insulin-dependent diabetes and heroin addiction. Both involve a body that has become physiologically dependent on a compound. The moral framework applied to each is completely different.
The analogy is not perfect, diabetes is not caused by voluntary behavior in the way heroin dependence begins, and the social determinants of the two conditions differ significantly. But as a description of how the same pharmacological process, dependency, is treated differently depending on who has it and what they're dependent on, it is precise and devastating.
Holiday understood in 1956 what the policy literature would not fully acknowledge for another sixty years: the drug war's target was not the drug. Hari quotes this passage because it says in one paragraph what his book takes three hundred pages to establish.
Sources
- Hari, Chasing the Scream (2015)
- Holiday, Lady Sings the Blues (1956)
Links for this item
- Posts
- No post is recorded for this item yet.
- Source page
- The sources for this item on RN Collins Selected Work
- Long-form
- This page is the full draft.
- Gallery
- See it in the gallery index
- Project
- About this library on RN Collins Selected Work
- Corrections
- Publication rules and the correction form
Course modules that assign this draft
- The Politics of Plants Course module
Reading list for this book
- Reading list: Chasing the Scream Reading list
NotebookLM packs on this book
- The Opposite of Addiction NotebookLM source pack
Bridge pieces that use this book
- The War Osmond Was Fighting and the War Anslinger Was Fighting Bridge piece
- The Race Against Time: Schultes's Urgency and Hari's Crisis Bridge piece
Science annotations on this book
- Endogenous DMT is produced by the pineal gland and mediates mystical states, near-death experiences, and deep... Science annotation
Then vs. Now comparisons on this book
- Rat Park: Was Alexander Right? Then vs. Now comparison
- The Opposite of Addiction: Connection, How Hari's Claim Holds Up Then vs. Now comparison
- Portugal's Drug Decriminalization: The 2026 Picture Then vs. Now comparison
- The Anslinger-Holiday Story: Historical Accuracy Then vs. Now comparison
- Chasing the Scream's Rat Park: The Replication Problem Then vs. Now comparison
- The Drug War Centenary: 2014 in Retrospect Then vs. Now comparison
- The Safe Supply Experiment: British Columbia 2023-2024 Then vs. Now comparison
- The Fentanyl-Naloxone Race: Has Harm Reduction Kept Pace? Then vs. Now comparison
- Billie Holiday's Historical Accuracy: What the Documents Show Then vs. Now comparison
- The Housing First Evidence: Connection as Concrete Policy Then vs. Now comparison
- The Racial Drug War in 2026: Has Anything Changed? Then vs. Now comparison
Claims from this book
- The opposite of addiction is connection Claim
- The drug war's racial targeting was incidental, an unintended consequence of neutral enforcement Claim
- Portugal's drug decriminalization model is a straightforward success that any country could replicate Claim
- Drug prohibition increases violence by creating black markets with no legal dispute resolution Claim
- Drug addiction is primarily a response to trauma, not primarily a pharmacological inevitability Claim
- Cannabis legalization does not produce significant increases in youth cannabis use Claim