Editorial draft · writing/mini-emperor-nylon-mini
The Timing of Nylon
Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.
The Timing of Nylon
“DuPont's nylon patent was filed in April 1937 and granted in September 1938…”historypolicy
“DuPont's nylon patent was filed in April 1937 and granted in September 1938. The Marihuana Tax Act was signed in August 1937 and took effect in October 1937. Herer said this was not a coincidence.”
The Marihuana Tax Act was signed into law on August 2, 1937 and took effect on October 1, 1937. DuPont's nylon patent was filed in April 1937 and granted in September 1938. Popular Mechanics published its 'New Billion-Dollar Crop' article describing hemp's industrial potential in February 1938.
Herer's argument: these are not independent events. DuPont needed hemp eliminated from the market to protect nylon's commercial position.
The correlation is real. Whether the correlation is causal is the question historians disagree about.
The case for causation, as Herer tells it: DuPont's financial institution was Mellon Bank. Andrew Mellon was Secretary of Treasury. Harry Anslinger, whom Mellon appointed to lead the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, was married to Mellon's niece. DuPont had been briefing Treasury officials on the decorticator technology that threatened nylon. The legislation was drafted by Herman Oliphant, who received DuPont's briefings.
The case against simple causation: the racial panic around cannabis, immigration anxiety, and the moral reform movement were independently sufficient to produce prohibition legislation. DuPont may have benefited without orchestrating.
The honest assessment: DuPont almost certainly benefited from hemp prohibition. Whether it engineered the prohibition or exploited existing political conditions is not fully established. Herer presents the former as fact. The evidence supports the latter.
Sources
- Herer, The Emperor Wears No Clothes (1985)
- Popular Mechanics, New Billion-Dollar Crop (February 1938)
- Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, 50 Stat. 551 (approved August 2, 1937)
- U.S. Patent 2,130,948, Synthetic fiber (granted September 20, 1938)
- Wishnia, Debunking the Hemp Conspiracy Theory, AlterNet (2008)
Links for this item
- Posts
- No post is recorded for this item yet.
- Source page
- The sources for this item on RN Collins Selected Work
- Long-form
- This page is the full draft.
- Gallery
- See it in the gallery index
- Project
- About this library on RN Collins Selected Work
- Corrections
- Publication rules and the correction form
Reading list for this book
- Reading list: The Emperor Wears No Clothes Reading list
NotebookLM packs on this book
- What the Record Actually Shows NotebookLM source pack
Bridge pieces that use this book
Science annotations on this book
- Psilocybin, by increasing visual acuity at low doses, provided adaptive advantages to early hominids that... Science annotation
Then vs. Now comparisons on this book
- Hemp's Industrial Potential: The Herer Claim Then vs. Now comparison
- The DuPont-Hearst Conspiracy: Evidence Assessed Then vs. Now comparison
- Cannabis Rescheduling: 2024-2026 Status Then vs. Now comparison
- Hemp Prohibition's End: What Herer Lived to See Then vs. Now comparison
- Cannabis and Racial Justice: Herer's Implicit Promise vs. the Industry Reality Then vs. Now comparison
- The Endocannabinoid System Discovery: Herer Was Right About the Biology Then vs. Now comparison
- The $40 Billion Cannabis Industry: Who Benefits? Then vs. Now comparison
- The Agronomic Claim: Hemp vs. Cotton Then vs. Now comparison
- The Federal Banking Problem: How Prohibition Persists Without Scheduling Then vs. Now comparison
- The Medicinal Cannabis Science: From Historical Claims to Clinical Evidence Then vs. Now comparison
Claims from this book
- Hemp prohibition in 1937 was orchestrated by DuPont and Hearst to eliminate hemp as competition Claim
- Cannabis's Schedule I status has no accepted medical use, the scheduling criterion is met Claim
- Cannabis has no accepted medical use, the Schedule I criterion is met Claim
- The 1937 Marihuana Tax Act was designed primarily to eliminate hemp as an industrial competitor Claim
- Industrial hemp can produce as much paper per acre as trees and with superior environmental impact Claim
Other pages in this library that link here
- The Politics of Plants Course module
- The History of Prohibition: Primary Sources and Policy Teaching module