Then vs. Now comparison · thenVsNow/tnv-emperor-10

The Medicinal Cannabis Science: From Historical Claims to Clinical Evidence

Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.

Then (1985), The Emperor Wears No Clothes

The Medicinal Cannabis Science: From Historical Claims to Clinical Evidence

Herer documented historical medical uses of cannabis extensively, 19th century pharmacopeia listings, physician testimonials, pre-prohibition clinical accounts. He was arguing from historical evidence in the absence of controlled trials. The controlled trial evidence was largely prohibited by scheduling.
confirmed
The clinical evidence for medical cannabis has developed significantly since legalization enabled research. Strongest evidence (multiple RCTs): chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (FDA-approved synthetic THC since 1985); chronic pain (systematic review of 28 RCTs, Aviram & Samuelly, 2017, positive); spasticity in multiple sclerosis (Collin et al., RCT, 2007, positive); childhood epilepsy syndromes (prescription cannabidiol, FDA-approved 2018, the first cannabis-derived FDA drug). Moderate evidence: anxiety, insomnia, PTSD (symptom management). Limited evidence: cancer-direct treatment (anti-tumor in vitro; no Phase 3 trials). Herer's historical evidence has been partially confirmed by controlled trials; his broader claims about cancer treatment remain at pre-clinical stage.

Sources