Editorial draft · writing/popular-mechanics-billion
The Billion Dollar Crop That Never Was
Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.
The Billion Dollar Crop That Never Was
“In February 1938, Popular Mechanics ran the headline 'New Billion-Dollar Cr…”historypolicy
“In February 1938, Popular Mechanics ran the headline 'New Billion-Dollar Crop' over a story on hemp. The Marihuana Tax Act had taken effect four months earlier, on October 1, 1937. The article forecast a cash crop worth several hundred million dollars a year.”
The February 1938 issue of Popular Mechanics carried an article under the headline 'New Billion-Dollar Crop.' It described a machine, the decorticator, that stripped fiber from hemp stalks, and it forecast a cash crop worth 'several hundred million dollars' a year. Rope, twine, linen and paper pulp were among the products it listed, and it said hemp would displace imported fiber. It also noted that federal rules for hemp growers were being drafted.
The Marihuana Tax Act had been signed by President Roosevelt on August 2, 1937 and took effect on October 1, 1937, four months before the article appeared.
Jack Herer uses this timing as the most concrete evidence for his conspiracy argument: a mainstream magazine was celebrating hemp's industrial potential just after the law that taxed and regulated the crop took effect. He argues that the decorticator would have made hemp economically competitive with DuPont's nylon and with the timber industry's wood pulp paper, and that the Tax Act protected both industries from that competition.
The documents support less than that. The article does not mention synthetic fibers. DuPont's nylon patent was filed in April 1937 and granted in September 1938, and nylon was aimed first at the silk stocking market. The Act's text excluded mature stalks, fiber, oil and the cake from the seeds, so it did not name hemp fiber as its target, although its registration and tax requirements burdened growers, and hemp processors asked Congress for changes in 1937. Whether this adds up to conspiracy or coincidence is the question the book leaves open. Herer answers conspiracy, and the documentary record supports correlation at most.
The Popular Mechanics article is available in the magazine's archives. It is one of Herer's strongest exhibits because it is a mainstream trade publication's assessment of hemp's commercial potential, published just after the new law took effect. It also shows that the industrial case for hemp was being made in public, where any reader can check it.
Sources
- Popular Mechanics, New Billion-Dollar Crop (February 1938)
- Herer, The Emperor Wears No Clothes (1985)
- Wikipedia, Marihuana Tax Act of 1937
- Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, 50 Stat. 551 (approved August 2, 1937)
- U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, Taxation of Marihuana, hearing on H.R. 6906 (July 12, 1937)
- U.S. Patent 2,130,948, Synthetic fiber (granted September 20, 1938)
- Science History Institute, Wallace Hume Carothers profile
- Wishnia, Debunking the Hemp Conspiracy Theory, AlterNet (2008)
Links for this item
- Posts
- No post is recorded for this item yet.
- Source page
- The sources for this item on RN Collins Selected Work
- Long-form
- This page is the full draft.
- Gallery
- See it in the gallery index
- Project
- About this library on RN Collins Selected Work
- Corrections
- Publication rules and the correction form
Reading list for this book
- Reading list: The Emperor Wears No Clothes Reading list
NotebookLM packs on this book
- What the Record Actually Shows NotebookLM source pack
Bridge pieces that use this book
Science annotations on this book
- Psilocybin, by increasing visual acuity at low doses, provided adaptive advantages to early hominids that... Science annotation
Then vs. Now comparisons on this book
- Hemp's Industrial Potential: The Herer Claim Then vs. Now comparison
- The DuPont-Hearst Conspiracy: Evidence Assessed Then vs. Now comparison
- Cannabis Rescheduling: 2024-2026 Status Then vs. Now comparison
- Hemp Prohibition's End: What Herer Lived to See Then vs. Now comparison
- Cannabis and Racial Justice: Herer's Implicit Promise vs. the Industry Reality Then vs. Now comparison
- The Endocannabinoid System Discovery: Herer Was Right About the Biology Then vs. Now comparison
- The $40 Billion Cannabis Industry: Who Benefits? Then vs. Now comparison
- The Agronomic Claim: Hemp vs. Cotton Then vs. Now comparison
- The Federal Banking Problem: How Prohibition Persists Without Scheduling Then vs. Now comparison
- The Medicinal Cannabis Science: From Historical Claims to Clinical Evidence Then vs. Now comparison
Claims from this book
- Hemp prohibition in 1937 was orchestrated by DuPont and Hearst to eliminate hemp as competition Claim
- Cannabis's Schedule I status has no accepted medical use, the scheduling criterion is met Claim
- Cannabis has no accepted medical use, the Schedule I criterion is met Claim
- The 1937 Marihuana Tax Act was designed primarily to eliminate hemp as an industrial competitor Claim
- Industrial hemp can produce as much paper per acre as trees and with superior environmental impact Claim
Other pages in this library that link here
- The Politics of Plants Course module
- The History of Prohibition: Primary Sources and Policy Teaching module