Editorial draft · writing/herer-hemp-war-1812
The Hemp War of 1812
Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.
The Hemp War of 1812
“Herer's most expansive historical claim: that the War of 1812 was primarily…”historyculture
“Herer's most expansive historical claim: that the War of 1812 was primarily fought over access to Russian hemp, and that Napoleon's invasion of Russia had the same commercial motivation. The argument is colorful and not completely wrong.”
Chapter 11 of The Emperor Wears No Clothes is titled 'The Hemp War of 1812 and Napoleon Invades Russia.' It is one of Herer's most sweeping historical claims: that the War of 1812, fought by the United States against Britain, was primarily motivated by American need for access to Russian cannabis hemp, the primary material for naval rope, rigging, and sail canvas, which Britain's naval blockade had cut off.
The historical evidence for hemp's economic importance in this period is real. The Royal Navy's demand for hemp was enormous, a single warship required dozens of tons of hemp rope, and hemp's primary source was Russia. British control of the seas threatened American access to this supply. The Congress of 1812 debated commercial grievances alongside the impressment of American sailors that was the stated cause.
Whether hemp was the primary cause of the war, as Herer claims, is a different question. Military historians have generally concluded that the war had multiple causes, trade rights, impressment, British support for Native American resistance to American expansion, Canadian territorial ambitions, and that reducing it to any single commercial motive overstates the case.
But Herer's broader point, that hemp was so commercially essential in the pre-industrial era that wars were fought over its supply, is documented in the naval and commercial records. The British Navy's dependence on Russian hemp, the Russian hemp trade's importance in European diplomacy, and the American colonies' early hemp cultivation as both commercial and strategic activity are all historical facts.
The War of 1812 chapter is Herer doing what he does throughout the book: assembling real historical evidence for a conclusion that the evidence supports but doesn't exclusively determine. Hemp mattered enormously to the early industrial world. The leap from 'mattered' to 'was the cause' is where his argument exceeds what the documents can bear.
Sources
- Herer, The Emperor Wears No Clothes (1985)
- Wikipedia, War of 1812
- Herer, Hemp for Victory chapter
Links for this item
- Posts
- No post is recorded for this item yet.
- Source page
- The sources for this item on RN Collins Selected Work
- Long-form
- This page is the full draft.
- Gallery
- See it in the gallery index
- Project
- About this library on RN Collins Selected Work
- Corrections
- Publication rules and the correction form
Reading list for this book
- Reading list: The Emperor Wears No Clothes Reading list
NotebookLM packs on this book
- What the Record Actually Shows NotebookLM source pack
Bridge pieces that use this book
Science annotations on this book
- Psilocybin, by increasing visual acuity at low doses, provided adaptive advantages to early hominids that... Science annotation
Then vs. Now comparisons on this book
- Hemp's Industrial Potential: The Herer Claim Then vs. Now comparison
- The DuPont-Hearst Conspiracy: Evidence Assessed Then vs. Now comparison
- Cannabis Rescheduling: 2024-2026 Status Then vs. Now comparison
- Hemp Prohibition's End: What Herer Lived to See Then vs. Now comparison
- Cannabis and Racial Justice: Herer's Implicit Promise vs. the Industry Reality Then vs. Now comparison
- The Endocannabinoid System Discovery: Herer Was Right About the Biology Then vs. Now comparison
- The $40 Billion Cannabis Industry: Who Benefits? Then vs. Now comparison
- The Agronomic Claim: Hemp vs. Cotton Then vs. Now comparison
- The Federal Banking Problem: How Prohibition Persists Without Scheduling Then vs. Now comparison
- The Medicinal Cannabis Science: From Historical Claims to Clinical Evidence Then vs. Now comparison
Claims from this book
- Hemp prohibition in 1937 was orchestrated by DuPont and Hearst to eliminate hemp as competition Claim
- Cannabis's Schedule I status has no accepted medical use, the scheduling criterion is met Claim
- Cannabis has no accepted medical use, the Schedule I criterion is met Claim
- The 1937 Marihuana Tax Act was designed primarily to eliminate hemp as an industrial competitor Claim
- Industrial hemp can produce as much paper per acre as trees and with superior environmental impact Claim
Other pages in this library that link here
- The Politics of Plants Course module
- The History of Prohibition: Primary Sources and Policy Teaching module