Editorial draft · writing/scijour-schultes-urgency-verdict
Schultes's Urgency: Has the Race Been Lost?
Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.
Schultes's Urgency: Has the Race Been Lost?
“Schultes said in 1967 that ethnopharmacological research was racing against…”ethnobotanyhistory
“Schultes said in 1967 that ethnopharmacological research was racing against time. The Amazon has since lost 20% of its forest cover. The race has not been won.”
The claim: 'In the search for new hallucinogens, we have much to do and little time in which to do it.' Schultes argued in 1967 that the aspirin pill, the mission school, and the road were destroying indigenous plant knowledge traditions faster than they could be documented.
The Amazon data: The Brazilian Amazon has lost approximately 20% of its original forest cover since Schultes made this statement. An estimated language, the primary carrier of ethnobotanical knowledge, is lost every two weeks globally. Communities that maintained the psychoactive plant knowledge traditions Schultes documented have been disrupted by Western medicine, economics, religion, and legal systems at an accelerating pace.
The response: The field Schultes established has expanded dramatically since 1967. The Society of Ethnobiology, the Amazon Conservation Team (founded by his student Mark Plotkin), ICEERS, and dozens of academic programs now work on documentation and preservation. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (2022) commits signatories to protect 30% of global land by 2030 with specific provisions for indigenous-managed territories.
The asymmetry: Individual documentation and protection efforts have been substantial. They have not matched the scale of loss. The communities whose knowledge Schultes documented have not been reconstituted. The plants he described are in many cases rarer or locally absent. The practitioners who held the knowledge have in many cases died without successors.
Verdict: Was right, and the urgency has increased. Schultes identified in 1967 what is now a mainstream conservation argument: that indigenous knowledge and biological diversity are inseparable, and that losing one loses the other. The race he described is still being lost at the macro scale. The institutions he inspired have slowed but not stopped the loss.
Sources
- Schultes, NIMH Symposium (1967)
- Schultes & Hofmann, Plants of the Gods (1979)
- INPA Amazon Reports (2023)
- CBD Kunming-Montreal Framework (2022)
Links for this item
- Posts
- No post is recorded for this item yet.
- Source page
- The sources for this item on RN Collins Selected Work
- Long-form
- This page is the full draft.
- Gallery
- See it in the gallery index
- Project
- About this library on RN Collins Selected Work
- Corrections
- Publication rules and the correction form
Course modules that assign this draft
- The Discovery Problem Course module
Reading list for this book
- Reading list: Plants of the Gods Reading list
NotebookLM packs on this book
- The Archive and the Fire NotebookLM source pack
Bridge pieces that use this book
- The Aspirin Pill, the Decorticator, and the Double Loss Bridge piece
- The Race Against Time: Schultes's Urgency and Hari's Crisis Bridge piece
Science annotations on this book
- Indigenous Amazonian pharmacological knowledge is accurate enough to have produced every major plant-derived... Science annotation
Then vs. Now comparisons on this book
- Plants of the Gods: Conservation Emergency Then vs. Now comparison
- Ayahuasca Goes Global: Traditional Knowledge Under Pressure Then vs. Now comparison
- Peyote Conservation Crisis Then vs. Now comparison
- Ethnobotany as Urgency: Schultes's Warning Then vs. Now comparison
- The Pharmacological Harvest: What Schultes's Work Has Produced Then vs. Now comparison
- The Psilocybin Pharmacopoeia: From Schultes's 91 Plants to Phase 3 Trials Then vs. Now comparison
- The Schultes Students: Did the Next Generation Continue His Work? Then vs. Now comparison
- Ibogaine's Clinical Translation: Schultes's African Documentation Becoming Treatment Then vs. Now comparison
- The Language Loss Crisis: Schultes's Warning at Acceleration Then vs. Now comparison
- The Peyote Supply Problem: Can Indigenous Ceremony Be Sustained? Then vs. Now comparison
Claims from this book
- Schultes's urgency about ethnopharmacological research was premature, there is still time Claim
- Every major plant-derived drug in the modern pharmacopoeia was first identified through ethnobotanical... Claim
- The peyote conservation crisis will result in the extinction of traditional Native American Church ceremonies... Claim
- The ethnobotanical pharmacopoeia represents the most important untapped resource for new drug development Claim
- Ibogaine is the most effective single-session treatment for opioid use disorder currently known Claim