Editorial draft · writing/narby-expedition
Night of the Liana: Scientists Take Ayahuasca
Education, not medical advice. Drafts and study material from an independent research library. Citations on this page were checked on Oct 13, 2026; claims in the body text and organizational sources are still under review. What was checked.
Night of the Liana: Scientists Take Ayahuasca
“Ten years after publishing The Cosmic Serpent, Narby brought three molecula…”historyindigenous
“Ten years after publishing The Cosmic Serpent, Narby brought three molecular biologists to the Peruvian Amazon for ayahuasca sessions under shamanic guidance. The resulting documentary captures what happened when skeptical scientists encountered what the book described.”
The Cosmic Serpent was published in 1998 and was criticized, most systematically, for failing to test its central hypothesis. Jacques Dubochet, who would later receive the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, wrote that Narby had not designed any experimental protocol for determining whether shamans actually access molecular-level information through ayahuasca.
Narby's response was, in effect, to run an experiment. Not a controlled clinical trial, that was not available to him, but an observational expedition with trained scientists as participants.
In 2000, Narby organized a journey to the Peruvian Amazon that included three molecular biologists, researchers working in fields directly relevant to the DNA hypothesis. They participated in ayahuasca sessions under the guidance of Shipibo-Conibo shamans, then discussed what they had experienced in relation to their scientific knowledge.
The resulting documentary, Night of the Liana, directed by Jan Kounen, was released in 2011. It shows scientists experiencing visionary states that included imagery they described as consistent with molecular and cellular structures, though they were careful about what claims they would make about what this meant.
Narby published a follow-up book, Intelligence in Nature (2005), which extended the DNA communication hypothesis into a broader argument: that intelligence, the capacity to solve problems, to communicate, to adapt, is not uniquely human but is distributed across the natural world at multiple scales. The argument drew on research into plant signaling, fungal networks, and bacterial communication.
The Night of the Liana expedition didn't prove The Cosmic Serpent's hypothesis. But it demonstrated the seriousness with which credentialed scientists could engage with it, and produced a documentary record of what the encounter between shamanic ayahuasca tradition and Western molecular biology actually looked like when it happened.
Sources
- Wikipedia, Jeremy Narby
- Night of the Liana documentary (2011)
- Narby, Intelligence in Nature (2005)
Links for this item
- Posts
- No post is recorded for this item yet.
- Source page
- The sources for this item on RN Collins Selected Work
- Long-form
- This page is the full draft.
- Gallery
- See it in the gallery index
- Project
- About this library on RN Collins Selected Work
- Corrections
- Publication rules and the correction form
Reading list for this book
- Reading list: The Cosmic Serpent Reading list
NotebookLM packs on this book
- The Serpent and the Code NotebookLM source pack
Science annotations on this book
- Lasting neuroplasticity from psychedelic exposure: the La Chorrera experience permanently altered the McKenna... Science annotation
Then vs. Now comparisons on this book
- DNA and Shamanic Vision: Narby's Hypothesis Then vs. Now comparison
- Ayahuasca Combinatorial Problem: How Did They Know? Then vs. Now comparison
- Indigenous Knowledge vs. Scientific Patent Law Then vs. Now comparison
- Shamanism as Academic Discipline: Narby's Framing Then vs. Now comparison
- Plant Intelligence: From Fringe to Research Frontier Then vs. Now comparison
- Mycorrhizal Networks: What Has and Has Not Been Shown Then vs. Now comparison
- The UNDRIP Framework: Indigenous Knowledge Rights in International Law Then vs. Now comparison
- Ayahuasca Clinical Trials: The Medicine Narby Described Is Now FDA-Tracked Then vs. Now comparison
- The Decolonization of Psychedelic Research: Narby's Framework Applied Then vs. Now comparison
- The DNA Biophoton Hypothesis: Has Anyone Tested It? Then vs. Now comparison
Claims from this book
- Shamans access molecular-level information (specifically DNA) through ayahuasca visions Claim
- Amazonian peoples developed the ayahuasca combination through rational empirical observation rather than... Claim
- Plants communicate with each other through chemical and electrical signals in ecologically meaningful ways Claim
- The extraction of indigenous pharmacological knowledge without benefit-sharing constitutes biopiracy under... Claim
Other pages in this library that link here
- The Discovery Problem Course module